WE RECOMMEND              PRINCIPAL PAGE               BUY A BOOK                FORUM                FREE CHAPTER

 

 

 

 

 

 

  AN ANTHROPOLOGIST’S PREFACE

 

     It is undeniable that in Perú many of the stories of opulent cities, full of  indescribable treasures and fantastic riches, are  of  european or perhaps  post-columbian sources,  thought out by the spanish  themselves for political  purposes.  Nevertheless, that fact does not set aside the existence of pre-columbian or even native post-columbian versions  that refer to the existence of cities whose location had been hidden, as occurred in the case of Machupicchu. It is possible that Paititi, with respect to which  tens of stories  are recorded, could be one of those cities which, the same as Choque-Sapra, Choque Suysuy and others, have remained “forgotten” up to our own days.

 

   At the least, two versions recently found, about Paititi, are impressive. One, the pan-peruvian myth of Inkari, founder of the capital of the Empire of the Incas, who after fulfilling  his mission, withdrew with many of his relatives to the city of Paititi. The other, relative to the decline of the Empire, relates in a legend the transfer of the religious objects  from the sanctuary  of  Wiracocha in Kacha, carried out by a group of inka nobles who, to save their gods from the merciless outrage by the spanish,  took them along with them  to the refuge in Paititi.

 

   Neither the myth of Inkari, relative to the initiation  of the Empire, nor the legend of the temple of Wiracocha, referring to its extinction, make mention of either treasures or riches, perhaps to avoid the covetousness which could  stimulate its search and location. Fernando Aparicio Bueno, a young man impassioned by the mysteries of peruvian  culture, has porposed to himself to find that city so linked  to the ideology  and tradition of Andean society.

 

   As part of his concerns and exploration, he offers this book, in which he makes known the treasures  found in the Walla Architecture, as well as petroglyphs and rock paintings.  These seem to prove the notable differences that exist betwen the physical expression  of  qheswas and antis 1 (i.e. West  and East parts of the incanate). Fernando offers us, also, concrete plans  2 see projet Paititi (39)  for the study  of  ancient remains  that still await  the arrival of that king  of scientist who will be able  to speak to them  and say “rise and walk”.

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                OSCAR NUÑEZ DEL PRADO

                                                             Dr. in Anthropology from UNSAAC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WE RECOMMEND              PRINCIPAL PAGE               BUY A BOOK                FORUM                FREE CHAPTER